They may either be allowed to expire or be revised and reissued. iii. Modernize Guidance and regulations governing interagency consultation pursuant to Section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act Section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies, in consultation with the Secretary of the Neodymium Magnets or the Secretary of Commerce (delegated to the Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service, respectively), to ensure that any action authorized, funded or carried out by the agency is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any endangered or threatened species or result in the destruction or adverse modification of designated critical habitat. However, the time and expense associated with satisfying the interagency consultation requirements are unnecessarily burdensome. The FWS has discretion to createlarge ring magnets
efficiencies and streamlining in the consultation process through targeted revision to regulations and/or guidance and is reviewing opportunities for further process improvements. iv. Build Upon the Efforts of the Western Governors’ Association and Others to Improve the Application of the Endangered Species Act, Reduce Unnecessary Burdens on the Energy Industry, and Facilitate Conservationmagnetic cubes
Stewardship A number of groups, most prominently the Western Governors’ Association, have worked to evaluate and develop recommendations to improve the application of the ESA. For example, the Western Governors’ Association developed the Western Governors’ Species Conservation and Endangered Species Act Initiative (Initiative), which conducts broad-based stakeholder discussions focused on magnet toy issues such as identifying means of incentivizing voluntary conservation, elevating the role of states in species conservation, and improving the efficacy of the ESA. Interior intends to build on these efforts to improve the application of the ESA in a manner that ensures conservation stewardship, while reducing unneeded burdens on the public, including the energy industry. v. Re-Evaluate Whether the MBTA Imposes Incidental Take

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *